From 0c22cad01fe778ca2df217c7ef2a68dfac24254d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vijay Pai <vpai@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:33:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Improve a comment in inproc transport
---
src/core/ext/transport/inproc/inproc_transport.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/ext/transport/inproc/inproc_transport.c b/src/core/ext/transport/inproc/inproc_transport.c
index 4df64d81e2..14498021eb 100644
--- a/src/core/ext/transport/inproc/inproc_transport.c
+++ b/src/core/ext/transport/inproc/inproc_transport.c
@@ -190,8 +190,11 @@ typedef struct inproc_stream {
static bool inproc_slice_byte_stream_next(grpc_exec_ctx *exec_ctx,
grpc_byte_stream *bs, size_t max,
grpc_closure *on_complete) {
- inproc_slice_byte_stream *stream = (inproc_slice_byte_stream *)bs;
- return (stream->le->sb.count != 0);
+ // Because inproc transport always provides the entire message atomically,
+ // the byte stream always has data available when this function is called.
+ // Thus, this function always returns true (unlike other transports) and
+ // there is never any need to schedule a closure
+ return true;
}
static grpc_error *inproc_slice_byte_stream_pull(grpc_exec_ctx *exec_ctx,
--
GitLab