Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
G
Grpc
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
tci-gateway-module
Grpc
Commits
59611fb5
Commit
59611fb5
authored
7 years ago
by
Juanli Shen
Committed by
Juanli Shen
7 years ago
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Update the doc about the policy selection condition.
parent
fe71c758
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
doc/load-balancing.md
+2
-2
2 additions, 2 deletions
doc/load-balancing.md
with
2 additions
and
2 deletions
doc/load-balancing.md
+
2
−
2
View file @
59611fb5
...
...
@@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ works:
that indicates which client-side load-balancing policy to use (e.g.,
`round_robin`
or
`grpclb`
).
2.
The client instantiates the load balancing policy.
-
Note: If a
ll
addresses returned by the resolver
are
balancer
address
es
, then the client will use the
`grpclb`
policy, regardless
-
Note: If a
ny one of the
addresses returned by the resolver
is a
balancer
address, then the client will use the
`grpclb`
policy, regardless
of what load-balancing policy was requested by the service config.
Otherwise, the client will use the load-balancing policy requested
by the service config. If no load-balancing policy is requested
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment