- Jul 22, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
- Jul 21, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
- Jul 20, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
- Jul 19, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
- Jul 17, 2017
-
-
Craig Tiller authored
-
- Jul 14, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
- Jul 13, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Craig Tiller authored
-
- Jul 12, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
- Jul 11, 2017
-
-
https://grpc.ioMehrdad Afshari authored
-
- Jun 27, 2017
-
-
murgatroid99 authored
-
- Jun 20, 2017
-
-
Ken Payson authored
-
- Jun 15, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
- Jun 08, 2017
-
-
Jan Tattermusch authored
-
Jan Tattermusch authored
-
- May 30, 2017
-
-
David Garcia Quintas authored
-
David Garcia Quintas authored
-
- May 23, 2017
-
-
Jan Tattermusch authored
-
Craig Tiller authored
-
- May 20, 2017
-
-
Ken Payson authored
-
- May 18, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
- May 17, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
- May 16, 2017
-
-
Ken Payson authored
-
- May 13, 2017
-
-
Ernie Miller authored
`require-relative` breaks Rubygems' ability to use the arch-specific directory in `extensions`. When building grpc extensions from source, we're left with a lot of intermediate object files and a duplicate shared object file as well. This space can be reclaimed by finding these object files inside the `gems` subdirectory of the installation location, while leaving the shared object file in the `extensions` subdirectory. See the comments at https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/926 for more on this behavior, which has been present in Rubygems for years. By using `require` instead, those of us who build from source can reclaim space consumed by duplicate and intermediate files, which amounts to a savings of 46MB (in a build of 1.3.2 on Alpine Linux). This is helpful when trying to minimize the size of a Docker image. I'm unclear on whether or not the reclaiming of this space can be automated as part of the build process. If so, it may be worth considering as a separate effort.
-
- May 11, 2017
-
-
Stanley Cheung authored
-
- May 10, 2017
-
-
Alexander Polcyn authored
-
Stanley Cheung authored
-
- May 04, 2017
-
-
murgatroid99 authored
-
- Apr 27, 2017
-
-
David Garcia Quintas authored
-